Friday, December 17, 2010

A White Muslin Gown (and What to Wear Under It), c. 1800

Friday, December 17, 2010
Susan reporting:

While the mantua-makers of Colonial Williamsburg concentrate on recreating historic dress from the 1770s, they do occasionally let their talented needles venture back and forth in time for special projects like this. The gown and turban, left, would have been the latest fashion for English and American ladies around 1800. The fabric is white cotton muslin, and the surface has been embroidered overall with tiny sprigs, stitched in white cotton thread.

While this style of gown with a raised waist and simple lines is familiar to modern eyes – particularly modern eyes familiar with the recent films based on the novels of Jane Austen – in the late 18th c., it would have seemed shockingly new.

For hundreds of years, the focus of women's dress had hovered around the natural waist, and stays, boning, and lacing had been combined to present a rigid, tapering torso. The appearance of a narrow waist has been increased by the full skirts, supported in the earlier 18th c. by hoops. Rich silks were the fabric of choice, with vibrant colors and elaborate patterning that came from either embroidery, or damask weaves. (See here and here for examples of gowns and here for stays and hoops from the 1770s; worn by the same model, Sarah Woodyard, it's easy to compare how the clothes change her shape.)

But all this changes by the end of the century. Aiming for classical simplicity, the new fashions featured high waists, simple lines, and pristine, light fabrics. While a few daring Frenchwomen would wear such a gown with few if any underpinnings, respectable Englishwomen did not – though compared to the whale-boned stays and hoops of the previous generation, it certainly must have felt wonderfully unencumbered.

Under her cotton gown, above right, Sarah is wearing a high-waisted petticoat with broad straps. Not only would this have given graceful volume to the gown, but it also would have offered a degree of modest opacity to the translucent white cotton, as well as helping to highlight the white-on-white embroidery as well. (See the detail of the embroidery, below right.)

Beneath the petticoat is a soft corset. Unlike the shorter stays, the corset extends below the waist and over the hips, creating a long, smooth line beneath the gown. Support comes from elaborate stitching rather than narrow rows of whalebone. The corset would have been worn over a light linen shift or chemise, never directly against the skin.

On her head, Sarah is wearing a silk turban for a touch of the exotic. The turban is trimmed with silver thread, silk ribbons, and of course an ostrich feather. Waistlines might rise, but feathers seemed to always be in style!

An observation: these photographs were taken in the Margaret Hunter millinery shop, which is illuminated entirely by natural light (and my camera's flash). On a late autumn afternoon, I was struck by how bright this all-white gown appeared in the shadowy room – an effect that never shows in 18th c. fashion plates. How the ladies originally dressed like this must have stood out in a sun-lit drawing room, or later in the evening by candlelight!

12 comments:

Miss Kirsten said...

Beautiful dress! She looks so much more comfortable in this dress, too, than she does in the others with the tight corset.

austenonly.com said...

Well, it was once declared that..."A woman can never be too fine while she is all in white..." and even though it was Edmund Bertram who made that statement (!) ,I agree with him in regard to the example shown in your post. I love white-on- white embroidery and this example is exquisite.

Julie x

Anonymous said...

What a lovely white dress! And what a charming model! I liked your observation about how bright the dresses appeared in a dim room. I think I remember reading that once gaslight came into play, white clothing made everybody look washed out and that's why coal-tar derivative/aniline dyes with their strong colors became so popular.
Searching for a source for that, but coming up short, so don't necessarily quote me.

MaryAnn Bassis said...

Lovely round gown. Whoever executed the embroidery is a skilled needleworker. It's nice to see that this level of craftsmanship still exists.

Jane O said...

It's a very pretty dress, and she looks comfortable in it, but I have to say that if I were going to all the trouble to get dressed up I would rather get to wear Lady Dunmore's ball gown.

Always Trista said...

This would make such a perfect wedding dress for a barefoot summer beach wedding!

Anonymous said...

Is it tambour work?

Carey said...

What a lovely dress! I really love your costume blogs especially the pictures of the details.

Susan Holloway Scott said...

Thank you, all, for the kind words.

Julie, that's a fantastic quote regarding white gowns.

Anonymous 1, an interesting point about the difference between candlelight and gaslight. Probably, true, too.

Anonymous 2, I don't believe it's tambour work, but embroidery. Click on the photo of the detail to enlarge it - two times makes it super-enlarged - to see the various stitches.

mamafrog said...

That's definitely embroidery. Tambour work leaves a fuzzy shape underneath--what becomes the underneath, actually. Working it leaves a smooth finished work that becomes the top, and the top becomes the underneath! That has a regular look of machine down embroidery because it looks smooth and even, without the vagaries hand stitching would leave.

mamafrog said...

Sorry, machine DONE, not Down!

Isabella Bradford/Susan Holloway Scott said...

Mamafrog - The whitework embroidery is in fact embroidery, not tambour work. However, like the rest of the gown, it was done entirely by hand, not machine. :)

There was an error in this gadget
 
Two Nerdy History Girls. Design by Pocket