Susan reporting,
If your weekend reading includes our Breakfast Links round-up, then you've likely come across an article or two from the New England Historical Society's blog.
This week the NEHS featured one of the most popular books printed (and reprinted) in both 18thc England and America: A New Academy of Compliments: Or, the Lover's Secretary: Being Wit and Mirth Improved, by the Most Elegant Expressions Used in the Art of Courtship, In divers Examples of Writing... Letters, relating either to Love or Business. No author is listed for this noble work, but then the entire book was probably cobbled together by the printer from multiple sources. Everything was fair game in those pre-copyright days, and there has always been a market for self-help books like this.
Although earlier editions exist from the late 17thc, there's one dated 1750 that's available free online for all of you who might need a little help in the social department. I'm sharing a few snappy responses for different social circumstances. But be prepared to study: these hot opening lines are every bit as wordy as the book's title.
To court a Gentlewoman on honourable Terms:
MADAM, I account this to be the happiest day I ever had in all the course of my life, wherein I have the Honour of being acquainted with you.
To which the Gentlewoman replies:
SIR, if I knew any thing in me worthy your Merits, I should think myself obliged to employ it in honouring of you. But finding nothing but Imperfection and Weakness, I believe the Knowledge of me will hardly yield you any content, much less Happiness.
But perhaps the Gentleman isn't in pursuit of an honourable (and apparently pathetically insecure) Gentlewoman. Perhaps he'd rather "accost a Lady, and enter into Discourse with her."
MADAM, I believe Nature brought you forth to be a scourge to Lovers, for she hat been so prodigal of her Favours towards you, that it renders you as admirable as you are amiable.
[Thus you may see how to speak to her. But here you must note that if it be a Lady to whom you had never spoke before, and with whom you are fallen passionately in Love, and towards whom you are resolved to continue your Love, you should proceed in this Manner]....
MADAM, if you accuse me of Temerity, you must lay your own Beauty in Fault, with which I am so taken, that you must lay your own Beauty in Fault, with which I am so taken, that my Heart is ravished from me, and I am totally subjected to you.
[You may make Use of such Language, and pursuing your Intent, reflect always upon your Constancy; shewing by your Discourses, that you are truely in Love, and so discreet and faithful , that none can be comparable to you.]
So how does the Lady respond to all these Discourses? Apparently with inscrutable one-liners that sound like the 18thc version of the Magic 8-Ball, otherwise known as "Witty and ingenious Sentences to introduce and grace the Art of Well-speaking."
SIR, I must enroll you in the Catalogue of my dearest Friends. You overcharge me with too great a Favour, in your condescending to pay me a Visit.
SIR, the Ocean's not so boundless as the Obligations you daily heap on me. I'll lodge them in my Bosom, and always keep them in my Heart.
And my personal favorite:
SIR, Your Tongue is as smooth as Oil with courtly Flatteries. You have inflamed me with the Ardency of your Deserts.
Still, as I read through this little book, I kept imagining aspiring heartbreakers of both genders struggling to memorize these suggestions. Perhaps the lady in the painting above has brought her own cheat sheet. How many of these would-be sweethearts were still rehearsing their drolleries in feverish whispers before the ball or the stroll in the park? And how many, finally (I hope!) abandoned the effort, and instead spoke plainly, from their own hearts?
Undaunted? Here's the direct link so you can make sure "the Virtues of your Mind would compel a Stone to become a Lover, and devote himself your humble Servant."
Above: Lovers in a Landscape by Pieter Jan van Reysschoot, 1740. Yale Center for British Art.
Laws Concerning Women in 1th-Century Georgia
2 weeks ago
1 comments:
Thank you, thank you for finding and posting this! It completes a piece of a historical puzzle I've encountered in writing my current book, and really makes some things fall together.
What I'm finding so far: it would take looking at period letters to know how much people used some of the expressions these types of books contain, but there was a societal slant to the effect that the more you respected someone or wanted to win their favor, the fancier you dressed your language. You pretended to pull yourself down, as if you were worth nothing. Lovers made little dramas of weeping at the fair one's feet to implore her favor.
There seems to have been an element of social drama and self-presentation in many interactions. This is nowhere more evident than The Church of England Man's Companion, which had been through fifteen printings by the 1770s, and has echoes even in the Book of Common Prayer. Some of the language is almost frightening, because of its despairing portrayal of human beings as woeful worms.
Seen through the lens of the ideas of the time, however, it was the fanciest possible address of the utmost respect to the highest--so that if you called yourself worthless to your fellow gentleman, who was of your own class, you'd better really pull out the stops when talking to God.
Thank you again for this post--it was timely. :-)
Post a Comment